Our outcomes of aortic valve sparing reimplantation (David procedure) in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and type A aortic dissection

Authors

  • Erhan Renan Ucaroglu Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bolu İzzet Baysal Education and Resource Hospital, Bolu, Türkiye
  • Sarper Seymen Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bolu İzzet Baysal Education and Resource Hospital, Bolu, Türkiye
  • Umut Ata Ugras Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bolu İzzet Baysal Education and Resource Hospital, Bolu, Türkiye
  • Turgut Okan Yilkin Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bolu İzzet Baysal Education and Resource Hospital, Bolu, Türkiye
  • Ufuk Turan Kursat Korkmaz Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bolu İzzet Baysal Education and Resource Hospital, Bolu, Türkiye
  • Kemalettin Erdem Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bolu İzzet Baysal Education and Resource Hospital, Bolu, Türkiye
  • Yusuf Velioglu Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye
  • Ahmet Yuksel Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye

Keywords:

Ascending aortic aneurysm, type A aortic dissection, aortic pathology, aortic valve sparing reimplantation, David procedure

Abstract

Aim: To present our outcomes with David procedure in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms (AAA) and type A aortic dissection (AD).

Methods: Thirty-six patients, aged between 38-75 years, followed-up in the cardiovascular surgery clinic of our hospital were included in the study. Patients’ demographic data such as age and gender, type of dissection, urea and creatinine values, length of stay in the ICU, duration of hospitalization were recorded. Outcomes of postoperative and long-term ecography were analyzed.

Results:  Of the 36 patients included in the study, 26 (72.22%) were male and 10 (22.78%) were female. The mean age of all patients was 60 ± 10 years. Ascending aortic aneurysm (AAA) was found in 20 (55.56%) patients and type A aortic dissection (AD) in 16 (44.44%) patients. In the postoperative echocardiography, 7 (23.33%) patients were normal, while 2 (6.67%) had trace aortic insufficiency, 17 (56.67%) patients had mild aortic insufficiency, 3 (10.00%) patients had moderate aortic insufficiency and 1 (3.33%) severe aortic insufficiency. Echocardiography performed one month after the operation revealed normal pathology in 10 (33.33%) trace aortic sufficiency in 2 (6.67%) patients, mild aortic insufficiency in 17 (56.67%) patients, and moderate aortic insufficiency in 1 (3.33%) patient.

Conclusion:  The results of this study indicate that aortic valve-sparing reimplantation (David) procedure can be safely and effectively performed in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and type A aortic dissection. It eliminates the need for a mechanical prosthesis and its complications.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-29

How to Cite

Renan Ucaroglu, E. ., Seymen, S. ., Ugras, U. A. ., Yilkin, T. O. ., Kursat Korkmaz, U. T. ., Erdem, K. ., … Yuksel, A. . (2023). Our outcomes of aortic valve sparing reimplantation (David procedure) in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and type A aortic dissection. Journal of Bionic Memory , 3(3), 54–60. Retrieved from http://jbionicmemory.com/index.php/jbm/article/view/41